The Pentax Forum.co.uk

The UK based Pentax Photography Forums

Skip to content

Follow us on Facebook BUTTON
  • About TPF
  • • TPF Terms
  • • FAQ
  • • Icon Help
  • • Key Commands
Advanced search
  • Welcome to The Pentax Forum.co.uk! A new community for PENTAX Photographers. Non Pentax brands welcome!
    Click here to register and join in!
  • Forum index
  • Gallery
  • Search
  • Forum index ‹ Pentax Digital Cameras ‹ Pentax Digital Medium Format
  • Change font size
  • Print view
  • Register
  • Login
  • View active topics

Pentax 645Z Testing

Pentax Digital Medium Format camera chat
Post a reply
55 posts • Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4

Top Forum Index Page New Posts

Posted on Wed Oct 29, 2014 8:01 am

Re: Pentax 645Z Testing

      

MattEmmett wrote:You are likely correct in your assessment, if you have a good DSLR to begin with, like a K3. At certain sizes the difference may appear minor although I still would notice the difference if I had also stuck the K3 on the tripod and shot the Pink hour straight afterwards.
But for those who require images to scale up to very large sizes 1m+ long edge, this camera really comes into its own. I have an exhibition starting in two weeks and I will get the pink hour blown up large for that. I suspect that's when I will fully realise what a great bit of kit the 645Z is.



Indeed and while most of us would never have the requirement for those display sizes, if you do have the that requirement then MF is surely the way to go. It's not such a rare requiremnet either. The world is full of large images on billboards, poster boards, etc I don't go out much but I see them everywhere when I do


Smeggypants
User avatar
Janitor
Posts: 5234
Images: 0
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 4:56 pm

Top Forum Index Page New Posts

Posted on Wed Oct 29, 2014 8:42 am

Re: Pentax 645Z Testing

      

Gravelrash wrote:I thoroughly get your point Doc. Most of the issues with my pics are user error and I have no foreseen need to decorate the side of a double decker bus with one of my images.

On the other hand I do enjoy telling myself that Matt's pics are brill because he is using a much dearer camera :rofl:



Oi!!!!! :)
There is some truth in that statement, if I posted some of my early abandoned images taken with the Canon 400D then you would certainly see a big difference.


MattEmmett
User avatar
Posts: 651
Images: 8
Joined: Fri Sep 12, 2014 10:00 am

Top Forum Index Page New Posts

Posted on Wed Oct 29, 2014 10:09 am

Pentax 645Z Testing

      

Large images on billboards and bus posters are not about fine art quality - even though they are very large if you look at them closely they are made from massive dots, like golf balls. And that is fine because they are designed to be viewed at large distances. Medium format is massive overkill for that market.

I can see many uses and of course it's nice to use the best that there is. It would be interesting to see a side by side comparison of 1 metre wide prints taken with different formats. If anyone follows the excellent 'the online photographer' blog they might have noted the highly erudite Mike Johnston's views on what is good enough. I have virtually no experience of printing (I will rectify that when I get to the UK) - I printed an A4 sized image from my old Canon G3 - it was a little less than 4megapixels and yet the quality at that size was excellent with bags of really fine detail.

The question of what is good enough I find interesting and wide ranging and I consider it quite a lot. It certainly is the case that the skill of the photographer is the single biggest factor, I have seen plenty of terrible images from very expensive equipment.

I'm not taking anything away from the 645Z, it looks tremendous. I'm just looking at and not feeling at all jealous.


Dr Orloff
Posts: 630
Images: 2
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:08 am

Top Forum Index Page New Posts

Posted on Sat Nov 01, 2014 11:57 pm

Pentax 645Z Testing

      

The main reason I was initially vacillating over the A7s was the pixel count (and the cost, though I've pretty much covered that now by selling all my Aps-C lenses and probably the K3 too). My only concern over pixel count has been cropping ability, as virtually all my aerial shots are cropped to 16:9 and I often have to crop out corners and edges due to the distortion from the windows. However, after experimenting with Autopano Giga, I'll buy it and use it for times when I feel I need more pixels. If it works as well as it seems to so far (using the trial version) I should be able to produce 40+ MP images if I so desire, which will probably only happen on shots of mountains or the occasional landscape. The ability to stitch large amounts of images easily, for me, will kill any desire for Medium Format.

For most (in fact nearly all) uses, 12mp is plenty. It should be here in a few days, can't wait to try it out!


aliengrove
User avatar
Posts: 1033
Images: 1
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:48 pm

Top Forum Index Page New Posts

Posted on Sun Nov 02, 2014 1:00 am

Re: Pentax 645Z Testing

      

aliengrove wrote:The main reason I was initially vacillating over the A7s was the pixel count (and the cost, though I've pretty much covered that now by selling all my Aps-C lenses and probably the K3 too). My only concern over pixel count has been cropping ability, as virtually all my aerial shots are cropped to 16:9 and I often have to crop out corners and edges due to the distortion from the windows. However, after experimenting with Autopano Giga, I'll buy it and use it for times when I feel I need more pixels. If it works as well as it seems to so far (using the trial version) I should be able to produce 40+ MP images if I so desire, which will probably only happen on shots of mountains or the occasional landscape. The ability to stitch large amounts of images easily, for me, will kill any desire for Medium Format.

For most (in fact nearly all) uses, 12mp is plenty. It should be here in a few days, can't wait to try it out!




I use PTGui for stitching many images works a treat. :)


Smeggypants
User avatar
Janitor
Posts: 5234
Images: 0
Joined: Sun Jul 06, 2014 4:56 pm

Top Forum Index Page New Posts

Posted on Sun Nov 02, 2014 5:40 pm

Pentax 645Z Testing

      

I've used PTGui too; what I like about Autopano is that you just select a folder, it automatically groups the images that can be stitched, and you just let it get on with it. Control points aren't usually needed, plus you can stitch images taken from different angles, at different exposures, and even different apertures, which are the main selling points for me.


aliengrove
User avatar
Posts: 1033
Images: 1
Joined: Sat Jul 12, 2014 10:48 pm

Top Forum Index Page New Posts

Posted on Sun Nov 02, 2014 8:06 pm

Pentax 645Z Testing

      

I've not used PTGui but I have used Microsoft's ICE (Image Composit Editor). Looking at PTGui it's very similar to ICE, but ICE can also work with video.
► http://research.microsoft.com/en-us/um/ ... s/ivm/ICE/

I found it to be very fast.
Oh, and it's free.


Steve.Ledger
User avatar
Posts: 2381
Images: 0
Joined: Thu Jul 17, 2014 7:43 pm

Top Forum Index Page New Posts

Posted on Tue Nov 04, 2014 4:40 pm

Pentax 645Z Testing

      

As some of you know, I took the plunge a while back and some things are becoming more an more apparent as I use it.
Depth of field (the good aspect of that) and general rendering is nothing short of sublime. Some rough comparisons at a recent wedding show the K5ii to be like a phone or compact in its harshness in similar conditions.
Wedding groups are amazing.
Cropping is a common thing and the Zed's files are a joy to work with; it keeps making me smile.
Conversely, I still stitch even the Zed's files, partly because I don't have a wide angle and partly because I'm greedy :)
I'm still not convinced about the colour saturation especially above 1600. Too early to tell, but it does seem to be a bit washed-out and not always in a way you can rectify (and why should you have more work to do?) Still time will tell, maybe it's me...
Extreme macro is proving disappointing, especially as that is one thing I was really looking forward to. Again, early days.

Most recent work: www.facebook.com/markdunkphoto
Darkmunk
User avatar
Posts: 25
Images: 3
Joined: Sat Oct 11, 2014 10:18 am

Top Forum Index Page New Posts

Posted on Tue Nov 04, 2014 4:51 pm

Pentax 645Z Testing

      

Nice to hear your thoughts and experience on this Mark. I hope you join in more often. :thumb:

Steve...Keepin' it Real
Gravelrash
User avatar
Posts: 2245
Images: 52
Joined: Sun Jul 13, 2014 1:09 pm
Location: Bolton, Lancs

Top Forum Index Page New Posts

Posted on Thu Aug 13, 2015 10:27 am

Re: Pentax 645Z Testing

      

Darkmunk wrote:Extreme macro is proving disappointing, especially as that is one thing I was really looking forward to. Again, early days.



Hello Mark,

Could you elaborate on this?

Many thanks

-Johan


nass
User avatar
Posts: 111
Images: 0
Joined: Tue Jul 22, 2014 9:04 am
Location: Surrey
  • Website

Previous

Post a reply
55 posts • Page 4 of 4 • 1, 2, 3, 4

QUICK REPLY

:) :D :yippee: :thumb: :rofl: :cheers: :cool1: :wink: ;wave: :nono: :confused: :eek: :( :oops: :fingers_crossed: :doh:
Help on how to post Images - View More Smilies
 
Share this Topic on Facebook:
Img
  • View active topics

Return to Pentax Digital Medium Format

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest

  • Forum index ‹ Pentax Digital Cameras ‹ Pentax Digital Medium Format
  • The team • About TPF • Terms and Conditions • Cookie Policy • Delete all board cookies • All times are UTC • Top of Page
Powered by phpBB3 © 2007 - 2014 phpBB Group - Additional Coding by Bug Bug & Bug™ ©2014

Smeggy ©2014